GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GRID K120Q

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS

GRID K120Q

2013Core: 745 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GRID K120Q Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GRID K120Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • +3568.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 2613.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

GRID K120Q

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $44 less on MSRP ($125 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (293 vs 10,749).
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3568.6% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 293), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $44 more expensive on MSRP at $169 vs $125, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2613.5% (63.6 vs 2.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GRID K120Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

NVIDIA

GRID K120Q

The GRID K120Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 293 points. Launch price was $937.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the GRID K120Q's 293 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 3568.6%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GRID K120Q uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1,536 (GRID K120Q). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K120Q).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGRID K120Q
G3D Mark Score
10,749+3569%
293
Architecture
Ampere
Kepler
Process Node
8 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2304+50%
1536
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.774 TFLOPS+196%
2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
72
128+78%
L1 Cache
2.3 MB+1669%
0.13 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K120Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGRID K120Q
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K120Q carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 64-bit on the GRID K120Q. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K120Q) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGRID K120Q
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+1100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
96-bit+50%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 (11_0) (GRID K120Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGRID K120Q
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 1 (GRID K120Q). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GRID K120Q).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGRID K120Q
Encoder
NVENC (5th Gen)
NVENC 1
Decoder
NVDEC (7th Gen)
NVDEC 1
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GRID K120Q's 225W — a 105.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (GRID K120Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGRID K120Q
TDP
70W-69%
225W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
160mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
153.6+11715%
1.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the GRID K120Q launched at $125. On MSRP, GRID K120Q was 26% cheaper ($44 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2.3 (GRID K120Q) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 2665.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGRID K120Q
MSRP
$169
$125-26%
Performance per Dollar
63.6+2665%
2.3
Codename
GA107
GK104
Release
February 2 2024
June 28 2013
Ranking
#252
#589

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.