GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GRID K240Q

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz

Popular choices:

VS

GRID K240Q

2013Core: 745 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • +323% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $331 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1151.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 15900% longer card at 160mm vs 1mm.

GRID K240Q

2013

Why buy it

  • Measures 1mm instead of 160mm, a 159mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,541 vs 10,749).
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 195.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $500 MSRPvs$169 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than GRID K240Q?
Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,749 vs 2,541 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while GRID K240Q is a 2013 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2013, 323.0% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 2 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is about $331 cheaper on MSRP at $169 MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting 323.0% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 1151.5%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.
Is GRID K240Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. GRID K240Q is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $500 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGRID K240Q
1080p
low85 FPS102 FPS
medium72 FPS83 FPS
high60 FPS65 FPS
ultra40 FPS38 FPS
1440p
low74 FPS85 FPS
medium64 FPS69 FPS
high47 FPS50 FPS
ultra30 FPS28 FPS
4K
low27 FPS28 FPS
medium25 FPS26 FPS
high17 FPS17 FPS
ultra15 FPS15 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGRID K240Q
1080p
low174 FPS88 FPS
medium149 FPS62 FPS
high118 FPS48 FPS
ultra87 FPS32 FPS
1440p
low129 FPS48 FPS
medium106 FPS31 FPS
high83 FPS23 FPS
ultra62 FPS17 FPS
4K
low74 FPS18 FPS
medium62 FPS12 FPS
high48 FPS9 FPS
ultra34 FPS7 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGRID K240Q
1080p
low484 FPS114 FPS
medium387 FPS91 FPS
high322 FPS76 FPS
ultra242 FPS57 FPS
1440p
low363 FPS86 FPS
medium290 FPS69 FPS
high242 FPS57 FPS
ultra181 FPS43 FPS
4K
low242 FPS57 FPS
medium193 FPS46 FPS
high161 FPS38 FPS
ultra121 FPS29 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGRID K240Q
1080p
low243 FPS114 FPS
medium210 FPS91 FPS
high171 FPS76 FPS
ultra144 FPS57 FPS
1440p
low185 FPS86 FPS
medium166 FPS69 FPS
high131 FPS57 FPS
ultra109 FPS43 FPS
4K
low104 FPS57 FPS
medium87 FPS46 FPS
high69 FPS38 FPS
ultra55 FPS29 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and GRID K240Q

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

NVIDIA

GRID K240Q

The GRID K240Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,541 points. Launch price was $469.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the GRID K240Q's 2,541 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 323%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GRID K240Q uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1,536 (GRID K240Q). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K240Q).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGRID K240Q
G3D Mark Score
10,749+323%
2,541
Architecture
Ampere
Kepler
Process Node
8 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2304+50%
1536
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.774 TFLOPS+196%
2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
72
128+78%
L1 Cache
2.3 MB+1669%
0.13 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID K240Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGRID K240Q
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K240Q has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K240Q) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGRID K240Q
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+200%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
96-bit+50%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 11_0 (GRID K240Q). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGRID K240Q
DirectX
12 Ultimate+9%
11_0
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GRID K240Q).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGRID K240Q
Encoder
NVENC (5th Gen)
Decoder
NVDEC (7th Gen)
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GRID K240Q's 225W — a 105.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (GRID K240Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGRID K240Q
TDP
70W-69%
225W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
160mm
1mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
153.6+1259%
11.3
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the GRID K240Q launched at $500. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 66.2% less ($331 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5.1 (GRID K240Q) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 1147.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGRID K240Q
MSRP
$169-66%
$500
Performance per Dollar
63.6+1147%
5.1
Codename
GA107
GK104
Release
February 2 2024
June 28 2013
Ranking
#252
#628