
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

L40S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $7,331 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2282.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 300W, a 230W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,749 vs 20,023).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
L40S
2022Why buy it
- ✅+86.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌4337.9% HIGHER MSRP$7,500 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($7,500 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 300W vs 70W.
- ❌66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024L40S
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $7,331 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2282.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 300W, a 230W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+86.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,749 vs 20,023).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌4337.9% HIGHER MSRP$7,500 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($7,500 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 300W vs 70W.
- ❌66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is L40S better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than L40S?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | L40S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 256 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | L40S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 784 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 629 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 478 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 416 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 528 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 332 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 201 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | L40S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 901 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 721 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 601 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 451 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 676 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 541 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 338 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 451 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 360 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 225 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | L40S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 288 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 117 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and L40S

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

L40S
L40S
The L40S is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 13 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,023 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the L40S's 20,023 — the L40S leads by 86.3%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the L40S uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 18,176 (L40S). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 91.61 TFLOPS (L40S). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 142 (L40S) with 72 Tensor cores vs 568.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | L40S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 20,023+86% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 18176+689% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 91.61 TFLOPS+1252% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2520 MHz+71% |
| ROPs | 32 | 192+500% |
| TMUs | 72 | 568+689% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 17.8 MB+674% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 142+689% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 568+689% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The L40S relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | L40S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the L40S has 48 GB. The L40S offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 960 GB/s (L40S) — a 471.4% advantage for the L40S. Bus width: 96-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 48 MB (L40S) — the L40S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | L40S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 48 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 960 GB/s+471% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 384-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (L40S). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | L40S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 8th Gen (L40S). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (L40S).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | L40S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the L40S's 300W — a 124.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 800W (L40S). Power connectors: None vs 16-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | L40S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-77% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-63% | 800W |
| Power Connector | None | 16-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+130% | 66.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the L40S launched at $7500. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 97.7% less ($7331 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2.7 (L40S) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 2255.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | L40S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-98% | $7500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+2256% | 2.7 |
| Codename | GA107 | AD102 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | October 13 2022 |
| Ranking | #252 | #76 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












