
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

M1 8-Core GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- β +115% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- β 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- β More future proof: Ampere (2020β2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β133.3% higher power demand at 70W vs 30W.
M1 8-Core GPU
2020Why buy it
- β Draws 30W instead of 70W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (5,000 vs 10,749).
- βLess VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- βWeaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024M1 8-Core GPU
2020Why buy it
- β +115% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- β 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- β More future proof: Ampere (2020β2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Draws 30W instead of 70W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β133.3% higher power demand at 70W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (5,000 vs 10,749).
- βLess VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- βWeaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than M1 8-Core GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is M1 8-Core GPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 56 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 40 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and M1 8-Core GPU

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
The M1 8-Core GPU is manufactured by Apple. It was released in November 10 2020. The core clock speed is 1278 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the M1 8-Core GPU's 5,000 β the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 115%. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8 (M1 8-Core GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+115% | 5,000 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+28700% | 8 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The M1 8-Core GPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the M1 8-Core GPU has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 68 GB/s (M1 8-Core GPU) β a 147.1% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. Bus width: 96-bit vs Unified.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s+147% | 68 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | Unified |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs N/A (M1 8-Core GPU). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.1 (Rosetta 2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+12% | 4.1 (Rosetta 2) |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs Apple M1 Video Encoder (M1 8-Core GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs Apple M1 Video Decoder. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,HEVC,ProRes,ProRes RAW (M1 8-Core GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | Apple M1 Video Encoder |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | Apple M1 Video Decoder |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,HEVC,ProRes,ProRes RAW |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the M1 8-Core GPU's 30W β a 80% difference. The M1 8-Core GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (M1 8-Core GPU). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 30W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | β |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6 | 166.7+9% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the M1 8-Core GPU launched at $0. The M1 8-Core GPU costs 100+% less ($169 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs Infinity (M1 8-Core GPU) β the M1 8-Core GPU offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | GA107 | β |
| Release | February 2 2024 | November 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #252 | #428 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












