GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+10438.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 2955.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 70W vs 30W.
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 70W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (102 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌2009 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT's 102 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 10438.2%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT uses TeraScale, both on 8 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+10438% | 102 |
| Architecture | Ampere | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+188% | 800 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+670% | 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 ×2 |
| TMUs | 72+80% | 40 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+1337% | 0.16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT carries 256 MB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+2300% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 10.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+20% | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs Avivo HD (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs UVD 1.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | Avivo HD |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | UVD 1.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT's 30W — a 80% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 30W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+4418% | 3.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT launched at $49. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT was 71% cheaper ($120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 2928.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $49-71% |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+2929% | 2.1 |
| Codename | GA107 | M98 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #252 | #818 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
