GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+17815% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 5094.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 70W vs 30W.
- ❌15900% longer card at 160mm vs 1mm.
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 70W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 160mm, a 159mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (60 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL's 60 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 17815%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL uses TeraScale, both on 8 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+17815% | 60 |
| Architecture | Ampere | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+188% | 800 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+670% | 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 ×2 |
| TMUs | 72+80% | 40 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+1337% | 0.16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 64-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+1100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 9_0b (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+33% | 9_0b |
| OpenGL | 4.6+119% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | — |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | — |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-1,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL's 30W — a 80% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 30W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+7580% | 2.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL launched at $49. On MSRP, MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL was 71% cheaper ($120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1.2 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 5200% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $49-71% |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+5200% | 1.2 |
| Codename | GA107 | M98 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #252 | #818 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
