
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Moore Threads MTT S80
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+327.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $91 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $260 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 558.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 9.7 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $260 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Moore Threads MTT S80
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,513 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: older-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌53.8% HIGHER MSRP$260 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Moore Threads MTT S80
Why buy it
- ✅+327.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $91 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $260 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 558.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 9.7 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $260 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,513 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: older-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌53.8% HIGHER MSRP$260 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Moore Threads MTT S80?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Moore Threads MTT S80 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 28 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 28 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 28 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Moore Threads MTT S80

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Moore Threads MTT S80
Moore Threads MTT S80
The Moore Threads MTT S80 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,513 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Moore Threads MTT S80's 2,513 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 327.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Moore Threads MTT S80 uses MUSA, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4,096 (Moore Threads MTT S80). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 14.75 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S80).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+328% | 2,513 |
| Architecture | Ampere | MUSA |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4096+78% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 14.75 TFLOPS+118% |
| ROPs | 32 | 256+700% |
| TMUs | 72 | 256+256% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Moore Threads MTT S80 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Moore Threads MTT S80 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4 MB (Moore Threads MTT S80) — the Moore Threads MTT S80 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MUSA Gen2 (Moore Threads MTT S80). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs MUSA Gen2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Moore Threads MTT S80).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | MUSA Gen2 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | MUSA Gen2 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Moore Threads MTT S80's 255W — a 113.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 550W (Moore Threads MTT S80). Power connectors: None vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-73% | 255W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-45% | 550W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 285mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+1452% | 9.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Moore Threads MTT S80 launched at $260. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 35% less ($91 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 9.7 (Moore Threads MTT S80) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 555.7% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-35% | $260 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+556% | 9.7 |
| Codename | GA107 | Chunxiao |
| Release | February 2 2024 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #252 | #635 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













