GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs NVS 810

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz

Popular choices:

VS

NVS 810

2015Core: 902 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • +801.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $531 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $700 MSRP).
  • Delivers 3635.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $700 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

NVS 810

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,192 vs 10,749).
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 314.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $700 MSRPvs$169 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than NVS 810?
Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,749 vs 1,192 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while NVS 810 is a 2015 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2015, 801.8% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is about $531 cheaper on MSRP at $169 MSRP versus $700 MSRP, and you are getting 801.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 3635.1%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.
Is NVS 810 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. NVS 810 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $700 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBNVS 810
1080p
low85 FPS33 FPS
medium72 FPS21 FPS
high60 FPS12 FPS
ultra40 FPS6 FPS
1440p
low74 FPS16 FPS
medium64 FPS9 FPS
high47 FPS4 FPS
ultra30 FPS2 FPS
4K
low27 FPS5 FPS
medium25 FPS3 FPS
high17 FPS2 FPS
ultra15 FPS1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBNVS 810
1080p
low174 FPS54 FPS
medium149 FPS40 FPS
high118 FPS28 FPS
ultra87 FPS18 FPS
1440p
low129 FPS22 FPS
medium106 FPS14 FPS
high83 FPS10 FPS
ultra62 FPS7 FPS
4K
low74 FPS6 FPS
medium62 FPS4 FPS
high48 FPS3 FPS
ultra34 FPS2 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBNVS 810
1080p
low484 FPS54 FPS
medium387 FPS43 FPS
high322 FPS36 FPS
ultra242 FPS27 FPS
1440p
low363 FPS40 FPS
medium290 FPS32 FPS
high242 FPS27 FPS
ultra181 FPS20 FPS
4K
low242 FPS27 FPS
medium193 FPS21 FPS
high161 FPS18 FPS
ultra121 FPS13 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBNVS 810
1080p
low243 FPS54 FPS
medium210 FPS43 FPS
high171 FPS36 FPS
ultra144 FPS27 FPS
1440p
low185 FPS40 FPS
medium166 FPS32 FPS
high131 FPS27 FPS
ultra109 FPS20 FPS
4K
low104 FPS27 FPS
medium87 FPS21 FPS
high69 FPS18 FPS
ultra55 FPS13 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and NVS 810

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

NVIDIA

NVS 810

The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the NVS 810's 1,192 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 801.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the NVS 810 uses Maxwell, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 512 (NVS 810). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1033 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBNVS 810
G3D Mark Score
10,749+802%
1,192
Architecture
Ampere
Maxwell
Process Node
8 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2304+350%
512 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.774 TFLOPS+540%
1.058 TFLOPS ×2
Boost Clock
1470 MHz+42%
1033 MHz
ROPs
32+100%
16 ×2
TMUs
72+125%
32 ×2
L1 Cache
2.3 MB+820%
0.25 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The NVS 810 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBNVS 810
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the NVS 810 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1 MB (NVS 810) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBNVS 810
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
96-bit+50%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 (12_1) (NVS 810). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 8.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBNVS 810
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
8+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 5 (NVS 810). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265 (NVS 810).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBNVS 810
Encoder
NVENC (5th Gen)
NVENC 5
Decoder
NVDEC (7th Gen)
NVDEC 2
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the NVS 810's 68W — a 2.9% difference. The NVS 810 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (NVS 810). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 198mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBNVS 810
TDP
70W
68W-3%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
160mm
198mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
153.6+778%
17.5
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the NVS 810 launched at $700. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 75.9% less ($531 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1.7 (NVS 810) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 3641.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBNVS 810
MSRP
$169-76%
$700
Performance per Dollar
63.6+3641%
1.7
Codename
GA107
GM107
Release
February 2 2024
November 4 2015
Ranking
#252
#826