
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

Quadro FX 3500
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro FX 3500 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro FX 3500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro FX 3500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅1421.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,430 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 38278.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quadro FX 3500
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌846.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,599 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro FX 3500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro FX 3500
The Quadro FX 3500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 265 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro FX 3500's 265 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 3956.2%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro FX 3500 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3500). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro FX 3500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+3956% | 265 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+860% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+989% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 72 | 80+11% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 3500 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro FX 3500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3500 carries 256 MB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3500. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 3500) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro FX 3500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+2300% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro FX 3500's 189W — a 91.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3500). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro FX 3500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-63% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+10871% | 1.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Quadro FX 3500 launched at $1599. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 89.4% cheaper ($1430 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.2 (Quadro FX 3500) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 31700% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro FX 3500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-89% | $1599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+31700% | 0.2 |
| Codename | GA107 | GT200B |
| Release | February 2 2024 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #252 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














