GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro FX 380

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 380

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro FX 380 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro FX 380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro FX 380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • 2147.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 4535.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 256 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quadro FX 380

2008

Why buy it

  • Costs $40 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2147.9% in average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 5972.9% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 177), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 55nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $40 more expensive on MSRP at $169 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 4535.5% (63.6 vs 1.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro FX 380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 380

The Quadro FX 380 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 177 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro FX 380's 177 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 5972.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro FX 380 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 240 (Quadro FX 380). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 380).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro FX 380
G3D Mark Score
10,749+5973%
177
Architecture
Ampere
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
8 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
2304+860%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.774 TFLOPS+989%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
72
80+11%
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 380 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro FX 380
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 380 carries 256 MB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 380. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 380) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro FX 380
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+2300%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
96-bit+50%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 380). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro FX 380
DirectX
12 Ultimate+20%
10_0
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro FX 380's 189W — a 91.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Quadro FX 380). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro FX 380
TDP
70W-63%
189W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
160mm
168mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
153.6+16967%
0.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Quadro FX 380 launched at $129. On MSRP, Quadro FX 380 was 23.7% cheaper ($40 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1.4 (Quadro FX 380) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 4442.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro FX 380
MSRP
$169
$129-24%
Performance per Dollar
63.6+4443%
1.4
Codename
GA107
GT200B
Release
February 2 2024
November 11 2008
Ranking
#252
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.