GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro FX 560

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro FX 560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro FX 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅2841.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 16582% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅4700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌15900% longer card at 160mm vs 1mm.

Quadro FX 560

2008

Why buy it

✅Measures 1mm instead of 160mm, a 159mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
76.9% HIGHER MSRP
$299 MSRPvs$169 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2841.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 9328.9% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 114), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 128 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 55nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $130 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 16582% (63.6 vs 0.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro FX 560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro FX 560

The Quadro FX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro FX 560's 114 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 9328.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro FX 560 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 240 (Quadro FX 560). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 560).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro FX 560
G3D Mark Score	10,749+9329%	114
Architecture	Ampere	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	2304+860%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS+989%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	72	80+11%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 560 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro FX 560
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 560 carries 128 MB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 4700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 560. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 560) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro FX 560
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+4700%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	96-bit+50%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 9_0c (Quadro FX 560). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro FX 560
DirectX	12 Ultimate+33%	9_0c
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro FX 560's 189W — a 91.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Quadro FX 560). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro FX 560
TDP	70W-63%	189W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	160mm	1mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	153.6+25500%	0.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Quadro FX 560 launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 43.5% cheaper ($130 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.4 (Quadro FX 560) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 15800% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro FX 560
MSRP	$169-43%	$299
Performance per Dollar	63.6+15800%	0.4
Codename	GA107	GT200B
Release	February 2 2024	November 11 2008
Ranking	#252	#815

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 560 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.