G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro GP100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro GP100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $6,831 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 3147.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 235W, a 165W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro GP100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quadro GP100

2016

Why buy it

✅65.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2016 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
4042% HIGHER MSRP
$7,000 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌235.7% higher power demand at 235W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro GP100 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 65.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 27.5% in PassMark G3D (13,710 vs 10,749), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 16nm, 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $6,831 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $7,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3147.4% (63.6 vs 2.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro GP100 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro GP100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro GP100

The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro GP100's 13,710 — the Quadro GP100 leads by 27.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro GP100 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3,584 (Quadro GP100). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1442 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro GP100
G3D Mark Score	10,749	13,710+28%
Architecture	Ampere	Pascal
Process Node	8 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	2304	3584+56%
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS	10.34 TFLOPS+53%
Boost Clock	1470 MHz+2%	1442 MHz
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	72	224+211%
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+77%	1.3 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro GP100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro GP100
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro GP100 carries 16 GB. Quadro GP100 gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1024 GB/s (Quadro GP100) — a 509.5% advantage for the Quadro GP100. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 4096-bit on the Quadro GP100. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4 MB (Quadro GP100) — the Quadro GP100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro GP100
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	16 GB+167%
Memory Type	GDDR6	HBM2
Memory Bandwidth	168 GB/s	1024 GB/s+510%
Bus Width	96-bit	4096-bit+4167%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 (Quadro GP100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro GP100
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 3rd gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro GP100
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	NVENC 4th gen
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	NVDEC 3rd gen
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro GP100's 235W — a 108.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Quadro GP100). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro GP100
TDP	70W-70%	235W
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	160mm	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	153.6+163%	58.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Quadro GP100 launched at $7000. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 97.6% cheaper ($6831 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2.0 (Quadro GP100) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 3080% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2016).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro GP100
MSRP	$169-98%	$7000
Performance per Dollar	63.6+3080%	2.0
Codename	GA107	GP100
Release	February 2 2024	October 1 2016
Ranking	#252	#178

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Search Quadro GP100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.