
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Quadro M1200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅182.0% more average FPS across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌55.6% higher power demand at 70W vs 45W.
Quadro M1200
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 70W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Quadro M1200
2017Why buy it
- ✅182.0% more average FPS across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 70W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌55.6% higher power demand at 70W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Quadro M1200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M1200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 36 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Quadro M1200

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro M1200
Quadro M1200
The Quadro M1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1093 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,212 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro M1200's 3,212 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 234.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro M1200 uses Maxwell, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 640 (Quadro M1200). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1.399 TFLOPS (Quadro M1200). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1150 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+235% | 3,212 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+260% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+384% | 1.399 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz+28% | 1150 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 72+80% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+642% | 0.31 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M1200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M1200 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro M1200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M1200). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,HEVC,VP8 (Quadro M1200).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,HEVC,VP8 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro M1200's 45W — a 43.5% difference. The Quadro M1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Quadro M1200). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 82°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 45W-36% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-9% | 82°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+115% | 71.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Quadro M1200 launched at $0. The Quadro M1200 costs 100+% less ($169 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs Infinity (Quadro M1200) — the Quadro M1200 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M1200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | GA107 | GM107 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #252 | #567 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












