
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Quadro M5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+14.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 575.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro M5000
2015Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,406 vs 10,749).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌491.1% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.4 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Quadro M5000
2015Why buy it
- ✅+14.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 575.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,406 vs 10,749).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌491.1% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.4 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Quadro M5000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M5000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 423 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 159 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 106 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Quadro M5000

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro M5000
Quadro M5000
The Quadro M5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 29 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 861 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,406 points. Launch price was $2,856.99.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro M5000's 9,406 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 14.3%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro M5000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,048 (Quadro M5000). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4.252 TFLOPS (Quadro M5000). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1038 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+14% | 9,406 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+13% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+59% | 4.252 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz+42% | 1038 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 128+78% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+207% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M5000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M5000 has 8 GB. The Quadro M5000 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro M5000) — a 25.6% advantage for the Quadro M5000. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 211 GB/s+26% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.1 (Quadro M5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M5000). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M5000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro M5000's 150W — a 72.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Quadro M5000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-53% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+145% | 62.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Quadro M5000 launched at $999. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 83.1% less ($830 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 9.4 (Quadro M5000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 576.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-83% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+577% | 9.4 |
| Codename | GA107 | GM204 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | June 29 2015 |
| Ranking | #252 | #280 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












