
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Quadro P3200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+25.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $331 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 270.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quadro P3200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,578 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌195.9% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Quadro P3200
2018Why buy it
- ✅+25.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $331 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 270.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,578 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌195.9% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Quadro P3200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P3200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 238 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 48 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 386 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 75 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 244 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 208 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Quadro P3200

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200
The Quadro P3200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1328 MHz to 1543 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,578 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro P3200's 8,578 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 25.3%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro P3200 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1,792 (Quadro P3200). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1543 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+25% | 8,578 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+29% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+22% | 5.53 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1543 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 112+56% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+248% | 0.66 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P3200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3200 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 (Quadro P3200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P3200). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.265,H.264 (Quadro P3200).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro P3200's 75W — a 6.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Quadro P3200). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-7% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+34% | 114.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Quadro P3200 launched at $500. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 66.2% less ($331 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 17.2 (Quadro P3200) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 269.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-66% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+270% | 17.2 |
| Codename | GA107 | GP104 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #252 | #304 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












