G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2359.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P6000 across 24 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quadro P6000

2016

Why buy it

✅71.8% more average FPS across 24 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅290.6% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 23 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
3449.7% HIGHER MSRP
$5,999 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Quadro P6000

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2359.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.

Why buy it

✅71.8% more average FPS across 24 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅290.6% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P6000 across 24 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 23 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
3449.7% HIGHER MSRP
$5,999 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro P6000 better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?

Yes. Quadro P6000 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Quadro P6000 averages 71.8% more FPS across 24 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 15,512 vs 10,749 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Quadro P6000 is a 2016 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 model from an older generation with DLSS Super Resolution. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2016, better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 8nm process instead of 16nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro P6000 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro P6000 is about 3449.7% more expensive on MSRP at $5,999 MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and you are getting 71.8% more estimated average FPS across 24 tracked games in our benchmark data and 44.3% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Quadro P6000?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (70W vs 250W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $169 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro P6000. The trade-off is that Quadro P6000 currently gives you 44.3% higher G3D Mark and 71.8% more estimated average FPS across 24 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Benchmark Check

Quadro P6000 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P6000
1080p
low	85 FPS	197 FPS
medium	72 FPS	183 FPS
high	60 FPS	159 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	145 FPS
1440p
low	74 FPS	182 FPS
medium	64 FPS	153 FPS
high	47 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	116 FPS
4K
low	27 FPS	114 FPS
medium	25 FPS	96 FPS
high	17 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	67 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Quadro P6000

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P6000
1080p
low	174 FPS	355 FPS
medium	149 FPS	306 FPS
high	118 FPS	227 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	182 FPS
1440p
low	129 FPS	225 FPS
medium	106 FPS	193 FPS
high	83 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	125 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	109 FPS
medium	62 FPS	91 FPS
high	48 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	58 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Quadro P6000

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P6000
1080p
low	484 FPS	698 FPS
medium	387 FPS	558 FPS
high	322 FPS	465 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	349 FPS
1440p
low	363 FPS	524 FPS
medium	290 FPS	419 FPS
high	242 FPS	349 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	262 FPS
4K
low	242 FPS	349 FPS
medium	193 FPS	279 FPS
high	161 FPS	233 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	175 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Quadro P6000

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P6000
1080p
low	243 FPS	520 FPS
medium	210 FPS	451 FPS
high	171 FPS	387 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	319 FPS
1440p
low	185 FPS	422 FPS
medium	166 FPS	367 FPS
high	131 FPS	300 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	245 FPS
4K
low	104 FPS	260 FPS
medium	87 FPS	247 FPS
high	69 FPS	215 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	175 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Quadro P6000

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Quadro P6000

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro P6000

The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro P6000's 15,512 — the Quadro P6000 leads by 44.3%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro P6000 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3,840 (Quadro P6000). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1645 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P6000
G3D Mark Score	10,749	15,512+44%
Architecture	Ampere	Pascal
Process Node	8 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	2304	3840+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS	12.63 TFLOPS+86%
Boost Clock	1470 MHz	1645 MHz+12%
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	72	240+233%
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+64%	1.4 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P6000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P6000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P6000 has 23 GB. The Quadro P6000 offers 290.6% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) — a 157.1% advantage for the Quadro P6000. Bus width: 96-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3 MB (Quadro P6000) — the Quadro P6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P6000
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	23.438 GB+291%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5X
Memory Bandwidth	168 GB/s	432 GB/s+157%
Bus Width	96-bit	384-bit+300%
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.1 (Quadro P6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P6000
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P6000
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	NVENC 5.0 (2x)
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro P6000's 250W — a 112.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 650W (Quadro P6000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P6000
TDP	70W-72%	250W
Recommended PSU	300W-54%	650W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	160mm	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	153.6+148%	62.0

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Quadro P6000 launched at $5999. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 97.2% less ($5830 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2.6 (Quadro P6000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 2346.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).