G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $731 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
✅Delivers 91% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
✅Draws 70W instead of 110W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

✅50.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌
432.5% HIGHER MSRP
$900 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.3 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($900 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌57.1% higher power demand at 110W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 50.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 178.8% in PassMark G3D (29,964 vs 10,749), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 12nm and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2019. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $731 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $900, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 91% (63.6 vs 33.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)'s 29,964 — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) leads by 178.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 40 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) with 72 Tensor cores vs 320.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score	10,749	29,964+179%
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Process Node	8 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2304	2560+11%
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS	7.987 TFLOPS+18%
Boost Clock	1470 MHz	1560 MHz+6%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	72	160+122%
L1 Cache	2.3 MB	2.5 MB+9%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores	18	40+122%
Tensor Cores	72	320+344%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) carries 8 GB. Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel). L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	96-bit	256-bit+167%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+300%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	6th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	4th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)'s 110W — a 44.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
TDP	70W-36%	110W
Recommended PSU	300W-54%	650W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	160mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	153.6	272.4+77%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) launched at $900. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 81.2% cheaper ($731 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 33.3 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 91% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
MSRP	$169-81%	$900
Performance per Dollar	63.6+91%	33.3
Codename	GA107	TU104
Release	February 2 2024	May 27 2019
Ranking	#252	#201

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Search Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.