
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 8000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $9,830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3091.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 260W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 8000 across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quadro RTX 8000
2018Why buy it
- ✅141.4% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅700% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 72).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌5816.6% HIGHER MSRP$9,999 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌271.4% higher power demand at 260W vs 70W.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Quadro RTX 8000
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $9,830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3091.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 260W, a 190W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅141.4% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅700% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 72).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 8000 across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌5816.6% HIGHER MSRP$9,999 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌271.4% higher power demand at 260W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro RTX 8000 better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Quadro RTX 8000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 70 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 289 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 90 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 897 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 717 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 598 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 448 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 673 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 299 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 224 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 673 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 448 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 355 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 224 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Quadro RTX 8000

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000
The Quadro RTX 8000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,927 points. Launch price was $9,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro RTX 8000's 19,927 — the Quadro RTX 8000 leads by 85.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX 8000 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4,608 (Quadro RTX 8000). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 8000). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 72 (Quadro RTX 8000) with 72 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 19,927+85% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4608+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 16.31 TFLOPS+141% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1770 MHz+20% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 72 | 288+300% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 4.5 MB+96% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 72+300% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 576+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The Quadro RTX 8000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 8000 has 48 GB. The Quadro RTX 8000 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 8000) — a 357.1% advantage for the Quadro RTX 8000. Bus width: 96-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX 8000) — the Quadro RTX 8000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 48 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 768 GB/s+357% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 384-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 8000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 8000). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 8000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro RTX 8000's 260W — a 115.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 8000). Power connectors: None vs 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-73% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+101% | 76.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX 8000 launched at $9999. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 98.3% less ($9830 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 3080% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-98% | $9999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+3080% | 2.0 |
| Codename | GA107 | TU102 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #252 | #78 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












