
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

Quadro RTX A6000
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro RTX A6000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro RTX A6000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro RTX A6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,480 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1197% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 300W, a 230W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quadro RTX A6000
2020Why buy it
- ✅171.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅366.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 72).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌2650.9% HIGHER MSRP$4,649 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 300W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro RTX A6000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro RTX A6000
The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro RTX A6000's 22,798 — the Quadro RTX A6000 leads by 112.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX A6000 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1800 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 84 (Quadro RTX A6000) with 72 Tensor cores vs 336.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 22,798+112% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 10752+367% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 38.71 TFLOPS+471% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1800 MHz+22% |
| ROPs | 32 | 112+250% |
| TMUs | 72 | 336+367% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 10.5 MB+357% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 84+367% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 336+367% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The Quadro RTX A6000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX A6000 carries 48 GB. Quadro RTX A6000 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX A6000) — a 357.1% advantage for the Quadro RTX A6000. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 384-bit on the Quadro RTX A6000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX A6000) — the Quadro RTX A6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 48 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 768 GB/s+357% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 384-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro RTX A6000's 300W — a 124.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Quadro RTX A6000). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin EPS. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-77% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin EPS |
| Length | 160mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+102% | 76.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Quadro RTX A6000 launched at $4649. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 96.4% cheaper ($4480 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4.9 (Quadro RTX A6000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 1198% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-96% | $4649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+1198% | 4.9 |
| Codename | GA107 | GA102 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | October 5 2020 |
| Ranking | #252 | #54 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














