GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro RTX A6000

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Quadro RTX A6000

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1800 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $4,480 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1197% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 70W instead of 300W, a 230W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

Quadro RTX A6000

2020

Why buy it

  • 172.7% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 366.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 72).
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
  • 2650.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $4,649 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • 328.6% higher power demand at 300W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro RTX A6000 better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Yes. Quadro RTX A6000 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Quadro RTX A6000 averages 172.7% more FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 22,798 vs 10,749 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Quadro RTX A6000 is a 2020 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 model from an older generation with DLSS Super Resolution. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2020 and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Quadro RTX A6000 is about 2650.9% more expensive on MSRP at $4,649 MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and you are getting 172.7% more estimated average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data and 112.1% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Quadro RTX A6000 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Quadro RTX A6000?
Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (70W vs 300W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $169 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro RTX A6000. The trade-off is that Quadro RTX A6000 currently gives you 112.1% higher G3D Mark and 172.7% more estimated average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro RTX A6000
1080p
low109 FPS270 FPS
medium92 FPS250 FPS
high77 FPS209 FPS
ultra45 FPS183 FPS
1440p
low95 FPS257 FPS
medium81 FPS214 FPS
high59 FPS167 FPS
ultra34 FPS150 FPS
4K
low30 FPS175 FPS
medium28 FPS144 FPS
high19 FPS104 FPS
ultra16 FPS93 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro RTX A6000
1080p
low174 FPS661 FPS
medium149 FPS555 FPS
high118 FPS420 FPS
ultra87 FPS361 FPS
1440p
low129 FPS489 FPS
medium106 FPS417 FPS
high83 FPS331 FPS
ultra62 FPS261 FPS
4K
low74 FPS255 FPS
medium62 FPS220 FPS
high48 FPS188 FPS
ultra34 FPS158 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro RTX A6000
1080p
low484 FPS929 FPS
medium387 FPS759 FPS
high322 FPS675 FPS
ultra242 FPS513 FPS
1440p
low363 FPS716 FPS
medium290 FPS586 FPS
high242 FPS509 FPS
ultra181 FPS385 FPS
4K
low242 FPS493 FPS
medium193 FPS408 FPS
high161 FPS342 FPS
ultra121 FPS256 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro RTX A6000
1080p
low243 FPS855 FPS
medium210 FPS784 FPS
high171 FPS684 FPS
ultra144 FPS513 FPS
1440p
low185 FPS679 FPS
medium166 FPS616 FPS
high131 FPS513 FPS
ultra109 FPS385 FPS
4K
low104 FPS489 FPS
medium87 FPS410 FPS
high69 FPS342 FPS
ultra55 FPS256 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Quadro RTX A6000

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX A6000

The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro RTX A6000's 22,798 — the Quadro RTX A6000 leads by 112.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX A6000 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1800 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 84 (Quadro RTX A6000) with 72 Tensor cores vs 336.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro RTX A6000
G3D Mark Score
10,749
22,798+112%
Architecture
Ampere
Ampere
Process Node
8 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
2304
10752+367%
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.774 TFLOPS
38.71 TFLOPS+471%
Boost Clock
1470 MHz
1800 MHz+22%
ROPs
32
112+250%
TMUs
72
336+367%
L1 Cache
2.3 MB
10.5 MB+357%
L2 Cache
2 MB
6 MB+200%
Ray Tracing Cores
18
84+367%
Tensor Cores
72
336+367%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The Quadro RTX A6000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro RTX A6000
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX A6000 has 48 GB. The Quadro RTX A6000 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX A6000) — a 357.1% advantage for the Quadro RTX A6000. Bus width: 96-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX A6000) — the Quadro RTX A6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro RTX A6000
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
48 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
168 GB/s
768 GB/s+357%
Bus Width
96-bit
384-bit+300%
L2 Cache
2 MB
6 MB+200%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro RTX A6000
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro RTX A6000
Encoder
NVENC (5th Gen)
NVENC (7th Gen)
Decoder
NVDEC (7th Gen)
NVDEC (5th Gen)
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro RTX A6000's 300W — a 124.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Quadro RTX A6000). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin EPS. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro RTX A6000
TDP
70W-77%
300W
Recommended PSU
300W-40%
500W
Power Connector
None
8-pin EPS
Length
160mm
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-12%
85
Perf/Watt
153.6+102%
76.0
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX A6000 launched at $4649. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 96.4% less ($4480 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4.9 (Quadro RTX A6000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 1198% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro RTX A6000
MSRP
$169-96%
$4649
Performance per Dollar
63.6+1198%
4.9
Codename
GA107
GA102
Release
February 2 2024
October 5 2020
Ranking
#252
#54