GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon 680M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅+180.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
❌15900% longer card at 160mm vs 1mm.

Radeon 680M

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 160mm, a 159mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,836 vs 10,749).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Radeon 680M

2023

Why buy it

✅+180.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 160mm, a 159mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
❌15900% longer card at 160mm vs 1mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,836 vs 10,749).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon 680M?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,749 vs 3,836 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon 680M is a 2023 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2023, 180.2% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 2 GB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $169 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 180.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon 680M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon 680M is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Benchmark Check

Radeon 680M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon 680M
1080p
low	109 FPS	127 FPS
medium	92 FPS	113 FPS
high	77 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	70 FPS
1440p
low	95 FPS	111 FPS
medium	81 FPS	93 FPS
high	59 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	57 FPS
4K
low	30 FPS	47 FPS
medium	28 FPS	44 FPS
high	19 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	16 FPS	28 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon 680M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon 680M
1080p
low	174 FPS	161 FPS
medium	149 FPS	128 FPS
high	118 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	63 FPS
1440p
low	129 FPS	107 FPS
medium	106 FPS	82 FPS
high	83 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	45 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	54 FPS
medium	62 FPS	43 FPS
high	48 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	22 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon 680M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon 680M
1080p
low	484 FPS	173 FPS
medium	387 FPS	138 FPS
high	322 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	86 FPS
1440p
low	363 FPS	129 FPS
medium	290 FPS	104 FPS
high	242 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	65 FPS
4K
low	242 FPS	86 FPS
medium	193 FPS	69 FPS
high	161 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	43 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon 680M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon 680M
1080p
low	243 FPS	173 FPS
medium	210 FPS	138 FPS
high	171 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	86 FPS
1440p
low	185 FPS	129 FPS
medium	166 FPS	104 FPS
high	131 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	65 FPS
4K
low	104 FPS	86 FPS
medium	87 FPS	69 FPS
high	69 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	43 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon 680M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon 680M

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon 680M

The Radeon 680M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,836 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon 680M's 3,836 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 180.2%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon 680M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 768 (Radeon 680M). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3.379 TFLOPS (Radeon 680M). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2200 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 (Radeon 680M) with 72 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon 680M
G3D Mark Score	10,749+180%	3,836
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	2304+200%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS+100%	3.379 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1470 MHz	2200 MHz+50%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	72+50%	48
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+820%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	18+50%	12

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 680M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon 680M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 680M has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs System.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon 680M
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+200%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	168 GB/s	System
Bus Width	96-bit	System
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12_2 (Radeon 680M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon 680M
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12_2
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 3.1 (Radeon 680M). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 3.1.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon 680M
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	VCN 3.1
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	VCN 3.1
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon 680M's 50W — a 33.3% difference. The Radeon 680M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Radeon 680M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.