GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon HD 8600/8700M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅+943.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.

Radeon HD 8600/8700M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,030 vs 10,749).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Radeon HD 8600/8700M

2013

Why buy it

✅+943.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,030 vs 10,749).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon HD 8600/8700M?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,749 vs 1,030 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon HD 8600/8700M is a 2013 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2013, 943.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 512 MB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $169 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 943.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon HD 8600/8700M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon HD 8600/8700M is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 8600/8700M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon HD 8600/8700M
1080p
low	85 FPS	28 FPS
medium	72 FPS	17 FPS
high	60 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	5 FPS
1440p
low	74 FPS	13 FPS
medium	64 FPS	7 FPS
high	47 FPS	3 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	2 FPS
4K
low	27 FPS	5 FPS
medium	25 FPS	3 FPS
high	17 FPS	1 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	1 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon HD 8600/8700M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon HD 8600/8700M
1080p
low	174 FPS	46 FPS
medium	149 FPS	37 FPS
high	118 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	23 FPS
1440p
low	129 FPS	35 FPS
medium	106 FPS	28 FPS
high	83 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	16 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	23 FPS
medium	62 FPS	16 FPS
high	48 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	8 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon HD 8600/8700M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon HD 8600/8700M
1080p
low	484 FPS	46 FPS
medium	387 FPS	37 FPS
high	322 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	23 FPS
1440p
low	363 FPS	35 FPS
medium	290 FPS	28 FPS
high	242 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	17 FPS
4K
low	242 FPS	23 FPS
medium	193 FPS	19 FPS
high	161 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	12 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon HD 8600/8700M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon HD 8600/8700M
1080p
low	243 FPS	46 FPS
medium	210 FPS	37 FPS
high	171 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	23 FPS
1440p
low	185 FPS	35 FPS
medium	166 FPS	28 FPS
high	131 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	17 FPS
4K
low	104 FPS	23 FPS
medium	87 FPS	19 FPS
high	69 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	12 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon HD 8600/8700M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon HD 8600/8700M

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon HD 8600/8700M

The Radeon HD 8600/8700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,030 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon HD 8600/8700M's 1,030 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 943.6%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon HD 8600/8700M uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8600/8700M). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8600/8700M). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 775 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon HD 8600/8700M
G3D Mark Score	10,749+944%	1,030
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 1.0
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2304+260%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS+583%	0.992 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1470 MHz+90%	775 MHz
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	72+80%	40
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+1337%	0.16 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 8600/8700M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon HD 8600/8700M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8600/8700M has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 8600/8700M) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon HD 8600/8700M
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+1100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	168 GB/s	System
Bus Width	96-bit	System
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon HD 8600/8700M's 50W — a 33.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8600/8700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8600/8700M). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.