
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+15.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
Radeon Pro 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,324 vs 10,749).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon Pro 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅+15.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,324 vs 10,749).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon Pro 5600M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5600M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 31 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 105 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon Pro 5600M

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
The Radeon Pro 5600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,324 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon Pro 5600M's 9,324 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 15.3%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 5600M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5600M). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1030 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+15% | 9,324 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+28% | 5.274 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz+43% | 1030 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 160+122% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5600M has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro 5600M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5600M) — the Radeon Pro 5600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5600M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon Pro 5600M's 50W — a 33.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 5600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5600M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 50W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-17% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6 | 186.5+21% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | — |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 12 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | June 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #252 | #283 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












