
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Duo
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+29.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,330 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1048.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Duo across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro Duo
2016Why buy it
- ✅11.3% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,299 vs 10,749).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌787% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon Pro Duo
2016Why buy it
- ✅+29.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,330 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1048.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅11.3% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Duo across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,299 vs 10,749).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌787% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon Pro Duo?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Duo still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 22 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 299 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 93 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon Pro Duo

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon Pro Duo
Radeon Pro Duo
The Radeon Pro Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,299 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon Pro Duo's 8,299 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 29.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro Duo uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Duo). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8.192 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Duo). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+30% | 8,299 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4096 ×2+78% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 8.192 TFLOPS ×2+21% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz+47% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 256 ×2+256% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+130% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Duo relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Duo has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro Duo offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro Duo). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro Duo). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro Duo).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon Pro Duo's 350W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Radeon Pro Duo). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-80% | 350W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+548% | 23.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Duo launched at $1499. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 88.7% less ($1330 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5.5 (Radeon Pro Duo) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 1056.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-89% | $1499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+1056% | 5.5 |
| Codename | GA107 | Capsaicin |
| Release | February 2 2024 | April 26 2016 |
| Ranking | #252 | #309 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












