
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

Radeon Pro Vega II
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon Pro Vega II Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon Pro Vega II FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon Pro Vega II: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,030 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 796.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Vega II across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon Pro Vega II
2019Why buy it
- ✅34.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌1201.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,199 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon Pro Vega II Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon Pro Vega II
The Radeon Pro Vega II is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1574 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,597 points. Launch price was $2,199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon Pro Vega II's 15,597 — the Radeon Pro Vega II leads by 45.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro Vega II uses GCN 5.1, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 14.09 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega II). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 15,597+45% |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4096+78% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 14.09 TFLOPS+108% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1720 MHz+17% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 256+256% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+130% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro Vega II leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega II carries 0 MB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon Pro Vega II) — a 414.3% advantage for the Radeon Pro Vega II. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 384-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega II. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega II) — the Radeon Pro Vega II has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 864 GB/s+414% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 384-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCE 4.1 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | UVD 7.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon Pro Vega II's 475W — a 148.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-85% | 475W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 160mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 120mm |
| Slots | 2-50% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+368% | 32.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Radeon Pro Vega II launched at $2199. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 92.3% cheaper ($2030 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 795.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-92% | $2199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+796% | 7.1 |
| Codename | GA107 | Vega 20 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | June 3 2019 |
| Ranking | #252 | #138 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














