
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

Radeon PRO W6600X
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon PRO W6600X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon PRO W6600X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon PRO W6600X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $530 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 239% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 120W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 241mm, a 81mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅45.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌313.6% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.8 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 120W vs 70W.
- ❌50.6% longer card at 241mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon PRO W6600X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon PRO W6600X
The Radeon PRO W6600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2479 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,113 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 13,113 — the Radeon PRO W6600X leads by 22%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W6600X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 10.15 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600X). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2479 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 32 (Radeon PRO W6600X) with 72 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 13,113+22% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+13% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 10.15 TFLOPS+50% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2479 MHz+69% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 128+78% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+360% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 32+78% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W6600X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6600X carries 8 GB. Radeon PRO W6600X gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600X) — a 33.3% advantage for the Radeon PRO W6600X. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6600X.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 224 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W6600X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 120W — a 52.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600X). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-42% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+41% | 109.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Radeon PRO W6600X launched at $699. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 75.8% cheaper ($530 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 18.8 (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 238.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-76% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+238% | 18.8 |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 23 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #252 | #197 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














