GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon PRO W7900

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon PRO W7900

2023Core: 1855 MHzBoost: 2495 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $3,830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 801.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • Draws 70W instead of 295W, a 225W reduction.
  • Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W7900 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Radeon PRO W7900

2023

Why buy it

  • 183.6% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 6 GB).
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
  • 2266.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,999 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • 321.4% higher power demand at 295W vs 70W.
  • 66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon PRO W7900 better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Yes. Radeon PRO W7900 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon PRO W7900 averages 183.6% more FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 28,211 vs 10,749 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon PRO W7900 is a 2023 card with FSR upscaling, while GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 model from an older generation with DLSS Super Resolution. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon PRO W7900 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 162.5% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 48 GB instead of 6 GB, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020), and a 5nm process instead of 8nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon PRO W7900 is about 2266.3% more expensive on MSRP at $3,999 MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and you are getting 183.6% more estimated average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data and 162.5% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon PRO W7900 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Radeon PRO W7900?
Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (70W vs 295W), and staying closer to $169 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon PRO W7900. The trade-off is that Radeon PRO W7900 currently gives you 162.5% higher G3D Mark and 183.6% more estimated average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7900
1080p
low109 FPS262 FPS
medium92 FPS242 FPS
high77 FPS210 FPS
ultra45 FPS183 FPS
1440p
low95 FPS246 FPS
medium81 FPS205 FPS
high59 FPS167 FPS
ultra34 FPS150 FPS
4K
low30 FPS174 FPS
medium28 FPS145 FPS
high19 FPS112 FPS
ultra16 FPS100 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7900
1080p
low174 FPS813 FPS
medium149 FPS639 FPS
high118 FPS471 FPS
ultra87 FPS405 FPS
1440p
low129 FPS617 FPS
medium106 FPS495 FPS
high83 FPS382 FPS
ultra62 FPS307 FPS
4K
low74 FPS320 FPS
medium62 FPS256 FPS
high48 FPS225 FPS
ultra34 FPS191 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7900
1080p
low484 FPS945 FPS
medium387 FPS775 FPS
high322 FPS690 FPS
ultra242 FPS595 FPS
1440p
low363 FPS714 FPS
medium290 FPS587 FPS
high242 FPS511 FPS
ultra181 FPS432 FPS
4K
low242 FPS498 FPS
medium193 FPS412 FPS
high161 FPS358 FPS
ultra121 FPS292 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7900
1080p
low243 FPS946 FPS
medium210 FPS801 FPS
high171 FPS714 FPS
ultra144 FPS621 FPS
1440p
low185 FPS714 FPS
medium166 FPS604 FPS
high131 FPS525 FPS
ultra109 FPS456 FPS
4K
low104 FPS505 FPS
medium87 FPS437 FPS
high69 FPS386 FPS
ultra55 FPS317 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon PRO W7900

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

AMD

Radeon PRO W7900

The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 28,211 — the Radeon PRO W7900 leads by 162.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 96 (Radeon PRO W7900) with 72 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7900
G3D Mark Score
10,749
28,211+162%
Architecture
Ampere
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
8 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
2304
6144+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.774 TFLOPS
61.32 TFLOPS+805%
Boost Clock
1470 MHz
2495 MHz+70%
ROPs
32
192+500%
TMUs
72
384+433%
L1 Cache
2.3 MB
3 MB+30%
L2 Cache
2 MB
6 MB+200%
Ray Tracing Cores
18
96+433%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7900 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7900
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 has 48 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) — a 414.3% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900. Bus width: 96-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) — the Radeon PRO W7900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7900
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
48 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
168 GB/s
864 GB/s+414%
Bus Width
96-bit
384-bit+300%
L2 Cache
2 MB
6 MB+200%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7900
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7900
Encoder
NVENC (5th Gen)
VCN 4.0
Decoder
NVDEC (7th Gen)
VCN 4.0
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 123.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: None vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7900
TDP
70W-76%
295W
Recommended PSU
300W-60%
750W
Power Connector
None
2x 8-pin
Length
160mm
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2-33%
3
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
153.6+61%
95.6
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 95.8% less ($3830 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 795.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7900
MSRP
$169-96%
$3999
Performance per Dollar
63.6+796%
7.1
Codename
GA107
Navi 31
Release
February 2 2024
April 13 2023
Ranking
#252
#26