
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,330 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1588.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 400W, a 330W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 280mm, a 120mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Why buy it
- ✅79.3% more average FPS across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌1970.4% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌471.4% higher power demand at 400W vs 70W.
- ❌75% longer card at 280mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,330 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1588.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 400W, a 330W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 280mm, a 120mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅79.3% more average FPS across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌1970.4% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌471.4% higher power demand at 400W vs 70W.
- ❌75% longer card at 280mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 54 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 94 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 593 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 445 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 148 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 593 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 445 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 148 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 13,182 — the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot leads by 22.6%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1967 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 60 ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) with 72 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 13,182+23% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3840 ×2+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+123% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1967 MHz+34% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96 ×2+200% |
| TMUs | 72 | 240 ×2+233% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+207% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 60 ×2+233% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — a 414.3% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. Bus width: 96-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 864 GB/s+414% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 384-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 4.0 (2x). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 400W — a 140.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-83% | 400W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 280mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+365% | 33.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot launched at $3499. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 95.2% less ($3330 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3.8 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 1573.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-95% | $3499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+1574% | 3.8 |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 21 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #252 | #157 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












