
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 7100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+39.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $630 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 559.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro WX 7100
2016Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,701 vs 10,749).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌372.8% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon Pro WX 7100
2016Why buy it
- ✅+39.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $630 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 559.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,701 vs 10,749).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌372.8% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon Pro WX 7100?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro WX 7100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 38 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 87 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 62 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon Pro WX 7100

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,701 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon Pro WX 7100's 7,701 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 39.6%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1243 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+40% | 7,701 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+18% | 5.728 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz+18% | 1243 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 72 | 144+100% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+311% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7100).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7100's 130W — a 60% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-46% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 241mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+159% | 59.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 launched at $799. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 78.8% less ($630 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 9.6 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 562.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-79% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+563% | 9.6 |
| Codename | GA107 | Ellesmere |
| Release | February 2 2024 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #252 | #331 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












