G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅93.7% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 122.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 28.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 28.6 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

2015

Why buy it

✅93.7% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 122.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 28.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 28.6 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon R9 270 / R7 370?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB averages 93.7% more FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 10,749 vs 4,260 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is a 2015 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2015, 152.3% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 2 GB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is about 13.4% more expensive on MSRP at $169 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 93.7% more estimated average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data and 152.3% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 4,260 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
1080p
low	109 FPS	77 FPS
medium	92 FPS	62 FPS
high	77 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	32 FPS
1440p
low	95 FPS	65 FPS
medium	81 FPS	53 FPS
high	59 FPS	37 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	23 FPS
4K
low	30 FPS	23 FPS
medium	28 FPS	22 FPS
high	19 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	16 FPS	12 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
1080p
low	174 FPS	111 FPS
medium	149 FPS	82 FPS
high	118 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	38 FPS
1440p
low	129 FPS	63 FPS
medium	106 FPS	42 FPS
high	83 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	20 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	23 FPS
medium	62 FPS	15 FPS
high	48 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	8 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
1080p
low	484 FPS	192 FPS
medium	387 FPS	153 FPS
high	322 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	363 FPS	144 FPS
medium	290 FPS	115 FPS
high	242 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	242 FPS	96 FPS
medium	193 FPS	77 FPS
high	161 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	48 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
1080p
low	243 FPS	135 FPS
medium	210 FPS	108 FPS
high	171 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	77 FPS
1440p
low	185 FPS	99 FPS
medium	166 FPS	81 FPS
high	131 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	54 FPS
4K
low	104 FPS	58 FPS
medium	87 FPS	44 FPS
high	69 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	25 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,260 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370's 4,260 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 152.3%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 975 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
G3D Mark Score	10,749+152%	4,260
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 1.0
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2304+80%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS+171%	2.496 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1470 MHz+51%	975 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	72	80+11%
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+505%	0.38 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 179.2 GB/s (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) — a 6.7% advantage for the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+200%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	168 GB/s	179.2 GB/s+7%
Bus Width	96-bit	256-bit+167%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (11_1)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	VCE 1.0
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	UVD 4.0
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370's 110W — a 44.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 450W (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 220mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
TDP	70W-36%	110W
Recommended PSU	300W-33%	450W
Power Connector	None	1x 6-pin
Length	160mm	220mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	70-7%
Perf/Watt	153.6+297%	38.7

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 launched at $149. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 costs 11.8% less ($20 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 28.6 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 122.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2015).