
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+79.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $631 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 748% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 7.5 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌15900% longer card at 160mm vs 1mm.
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
2014Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 160mm, a 159mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,000 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌373.4% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
2014Why buy it
- ✅+79.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $631 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 748% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 7.5 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 160mm, a 159mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌15900% longer card at 160mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,000 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌373.4% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 5 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 20 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 68 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 14 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire's 6,000 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 79.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire uses GCN, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+79% | 6,000 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz+63% | 900 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 307.2 GB/s (Dual) (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) — a 82.9% advantage for the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire. Bus width: 96-bit vs 512-bit (Dual).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 307.2 GB/s (Dual)+83% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 512-bit (Dual)+433% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire's 200W — a 96.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Card length: 160mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-65% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 160mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+412% | 30.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire launched at $800. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 78.9% less ($631 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7.5 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 748% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-79% | $800 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+748% | 7.5 |
| Codename | GA107 | Neptune CF |
| Release | February 2 2024 | March 1 2014 |
| Ranking | #252 | #348 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












