
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+115% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $281 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 472.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,000 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌166.3% HIGHER MSRP$450 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
2014Why buy it
- ✅+115% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $281 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 472.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,000 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌166.3% HIGHER MSRP$450 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 56 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition's 5,000 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 115%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+115% | 5,000 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+13% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+95% | 3.482 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 72 | 128+78% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+360% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 174 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) — a 3.6% advantage for the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 174 GB/s+4% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition's 250W — a 112.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-72% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 160mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+668% | 20.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition launched at $450. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 62.4% less ($281 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 11.1 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 473% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-62% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+473% | 11.1 |
| Codename | GA107 | Amethyst |
| Release | February 2 2024 | November 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #252 | #436 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












