
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 470/570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅11.2% more average FPS across 28 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 43.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon RX 470/570
2016Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 28 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌5.9% HIGHER MSRP$179 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.3 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon RX 470/570
2016Why buy it
- ✅11.2% more average FPS across 28 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 43.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 28 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌5.9% HIGHER MSRP$179 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.3 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon RX 470/570?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 470/570 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 89 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon RX 470/570

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon RX 470/570
Radeon RX 470/570
The Radeon RX 470/570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 926 MHz to 1206 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,935 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon RX 470/570's 7,935 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 35.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 470/570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 470/570). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4.94 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 470/570). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1206 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+35% | 7,935 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+13% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+37% | 4.94 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz+22% | 1206 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 72 | 128+78% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+360% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 470/570 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 470/570 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 470/570 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 470/570) — a 33.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 470/570. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 224 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 470/570). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 470/570). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 470/570).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 470/570's 120W — a 52.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 450W (Radeon RX 470/570). Power connectors: None vs 6-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-42% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-33% | 450W |
| Power Connector | None | 6-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+132% | 66.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 470/570 launched at $179. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 5.6% less ($10 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 44.3 (Radeon RX 470/570) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 43.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-6% | $179 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+44% | 44.3 |
| Codename | GA107 | Ellesmere |
| Release | February 2 2024 | August 4 2016 |
| Ranking | #252 | #315 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












