
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+21.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 150W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Radeon RX 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,857 vs 10,749).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 70W.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon RX 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅+21.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 150W, a 80W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,857 vs 10,749).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon RX 5600M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 5600M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 100 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 65 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon RX 5600M

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon RX 5600M
Radeon RX 5600M
The Radeon RX 5600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1265 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,857 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon RX 5600M's 8,857 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 21.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 5600M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600M). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5.829 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600M). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1265 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+21% | 8,857 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+16% | 5.829 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz+16% | 1265 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 144+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5600M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 5600M) — a 71.4% advantage for the Radeon RX 5600M. Bus width: 96-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600M) — the Radeon RX 5600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 288 GB/s+71% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 192-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600M). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 5600M's 150W — a 72.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5600M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-53% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-17% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+160% | 59.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | — |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 10 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | July 7 2020 |
| Ranking | #252 | #295 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












