
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+44.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
Radeon RX 6500M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,443 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon RX 6500M
2022Why buy it
- ✅+44.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,443 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon RX 6500M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6500M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 31 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 24 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 335 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 74 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon RX 6500M

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6500M
The Radeon RX 6500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,443 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon RX 6500M's 7,443 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 44.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6500M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500M). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4.915 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500M). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 16 (Radeon RX 6500M) with 72 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+44% | 7,443 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+125% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+38% | 4.915 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2400 MHz+63% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 72+13% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+820% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18+13% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6500M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6500M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6500M) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. Bus width: 96-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500M) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s+17% | 144 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6500M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6500M). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon RX 6500M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 6500M's 50W — a 33.3% difference. The Radeon RX 6500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6500M). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 50W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 160mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+3% | 148.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | — |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 24 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #252 | #341 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












