
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6600 LE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $160 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 52.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 41.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 132W, a 62W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 190mm, a 30mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6600 LE across 28 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6600 LE is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon RX 6600 LE
2023Why buy it
- ✅41.3% more average FPS across 28 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌94.7% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 41.8 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌88.6% higher power demand at 132W vs 70W.
- ❌18.8% longer card at 190mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon RX 6600 LE
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $160 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 52.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 41.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 132W, a 62W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 190mm, a 30mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅41.3% more average FPS across 28 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6600 LE across 28 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6600 LE is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌94.7% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 41.8 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌88.6% higher power demand at 132W vs 70W.
- ❌18.8% longer card at 190mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6600 LE better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Radeon RX 6600 LE?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 495 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 232 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 155 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 244 FPS | 468 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 208 FPS | 408 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 211 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 143 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon RX 6600 LE

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon RX 6600 LE
Radeon RX 6600 LE
The Radeon RX 6600 LE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 8 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,758 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon RX 6600 LE's 13,758 — the Radeon RX 6600 LE leads by 28%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6600 LE uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8.942 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 28 (Radeon RX 6600 LE) with 72 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 13,758+28% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+29% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 8.942 TFLOPS+32% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2495 MHz+70% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 112+56% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+360% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 28+56% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6600 LE is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6600 LE relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6600 LE has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 6600 LE offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6600 LE) — a 33.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 6600 LE. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 224 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6600 LE).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 6600 LE's 132W — a 61.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 450W (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 190mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-47% | 132W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-33% | 450W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 190mm |
| Height | — | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+47% | 104.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6600 LE launched at $329. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 48.6% less ($160 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 41.8 (Radeon RX 6600 LE) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 52.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-49% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+52% | 41.8 |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 23 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | December 8 2023 |
| Ranking | #252 | #176 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












