
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6600 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $210 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 46.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 43.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 160W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 190mm, a 30mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6600 XT across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Radeon RX 6600 XT
2021Why buy it
- ✅58.9% more average FPS across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌124.3% HIGHER MSRP$379 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 43.4 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 70W.
- ❌18.8% longer card at 190mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon RX 6600 XT
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $210 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 46.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 43.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 160W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 190mm, a 30mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅58.9% more average FPS across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6600 XT across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌124.3% HIGHER MSRP$379 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 43.4 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 70W.
- ❌18.8% longer card at 190mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6600 XT better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Radeon RX 6600 XT?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 740 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 592 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 370 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 278 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 296 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 185 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 637 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 363 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 398 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 185 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon RX 6600 XT

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT
The Radeon RX 6600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 30 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1968 MHz to 2589 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,453 points. Launch price was $379.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon RX 6600 XT's 16,453 — the Radeon RX 6600 XT leads by 53.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6600 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 6600 XT). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 10.6 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600 XT). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2589 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 32 (Radeon RX 6600 XT) with 72 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 16,453+53% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+13% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 10.6 TFLOPS+56% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2589 MHz+76% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 128+78% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+360% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 32+78% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6600 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6600 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6600 XT has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 6600 XT offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 6600 XT) — a 52.4% advantage for the Radeon RX 6600 XT. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 256 GB/s+52% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6600 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCE (Radeon RX 6600 XT). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6600 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCE |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 6600 XT's 160W — a 78.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6600 XT). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 190mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-56% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 190mm |
| Height | — | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+49% | 102.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6600 XT launched at $379. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 55.4% less ($210 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 43.4 (Radeon RX 6600 XT) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 46.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-55% | $379 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+47% | 43.4 |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 23 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | July 30 2021 |
| Ranking | #252 | #122 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












