
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6800 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $480 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 65.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 38.5 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 300W, a 230W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6800 XT across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Radeon RX 6800 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅126.9% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌284% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.5 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 300W vs 70W.
- ❌66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon RX 6800 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $480 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 65.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 38.5 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 300W, a 230W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅126.9% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6800 XT across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌284% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.5 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 300W vs 70W.
- ❌66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6800 XT better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Radeon RX 6800 XT?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 83 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 327 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 359 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 296 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 89 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 924 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 767 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 562 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 422 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 281 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 663 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 552 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 466 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 359 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 355 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 252 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon RX 6800 XT

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon RX 6800 XT
Radeon RX 6800 XT
The Radeon RX 6800 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,995 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon RX 6800 XT's 24,995 — the Radeon RX 6800 XT leads by 132.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6800 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4,608 (Radeon RX 6800 XT). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 20.74 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6800 XT). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2250 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 72 (Radeon RX 6800 XT) with 72 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 24,995+133% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4608+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 20.74 TFLOPS+206% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2250 MHz+53% |
| ROPs | 32 | 128+300% |
| TMUs | 72 | 288+300% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+130% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 72+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6800 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6800 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6800 XT has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 6800 XT offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon RX 6800 XT) — a 204.8% advantage for the Radeon RX 6800 XT. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 6800 XT) — the Radeon RX 6800 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 512 GB/s+205% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 6800 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6800 XT). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6800 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 6800 XT's 300W — a 124.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 750W (Radeon RX 6800 XT). Power connectors: None vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-77% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-60% | 750W |
| Power Connector | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 120mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+84% | 83.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6800 XT launched at $649. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 74% less ($480 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 38.5 (Radeon RX 6800 XT) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 65.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-74% | $649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+65% | 38.5 |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 21 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #252 | #42 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












