
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

Radeon RX 7900 XT
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon RX 7900 XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon RX 7900 XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon RX 7900 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $730 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 97.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 32.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 300W, a 230W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 276mm, a 116mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 20 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Radeon RX 7900 XT is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
Radeon RX 7900 XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅156.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅233.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (20 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌432% HIGHER MSRP$899 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 32.3 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 300W vs 70W.
- ❌72.5% longer card at 276mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon RX 7900 XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon RX 7900 XT
The Radeon RX 7900 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 3 2022. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1387 MHz to 2394 MHz. It has 5376 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,996 points. Launch price was $899.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon RX 7900 XT's 28,996 — the Radeon RX 7900 XT leads by 169.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 7900 XT uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5,376 (Radeon RX 7900 XT). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 51.48 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900 XT). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2394 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 84 (Radeon RX 7900 XT) with 72 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 28,996+170% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 5376+133% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 51.48 TFLOPS+660% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2394 MHz+63% |
| ROPs | 32 | 192+500% |
| TMUs | 72 | 336+367% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 3 MB+30% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 84+367% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 7900 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 7900 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7900 XT carries 20 GB. Radeon RX 7900 XT gives you 233.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 800 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900 XT) — a 376.2% advantage for the Radeon RX 7900 XT. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 320-bit on the Radeon RX 7900 XT. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900 XT) — the Radeon RX 7900 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 20 GB+233% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 800 GB/s+376% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 320-bit+233% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7900 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900 XT). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX 7900 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 7900 XT's 300W — a 124.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 750W (Radeon RX 7900 XT). Power connectors: None vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 276mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-77% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-60% | 750W |
| Power Connector | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 276mm |
| Height | — | 110mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+59% | 96.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Radeon RX 7900 XT launched at $899. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 81.2% cheaper ($730 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 32.3 (Radeon RX 7900 XT) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 96.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-81% | $899 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+97% | 32.3 |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 31 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | November 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #252 | #21 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














