GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Radeon X1600
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon X1600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon X1600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon X1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅8724.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25730.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon X1600
2020Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌17.8% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon X1600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Radeon X1600
The Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2105 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon X1600's 49 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 21836.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon X1600 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4,608 (Radeon X1600). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 19.4 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2105 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+21837% | 49 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4608+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 19.4 TFLOPS+186% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2105 MHz+43% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 288+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1600 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 64-bit on the Radeon X1600.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+1100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+33% | 9_0c |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs Avivo (Radeon X1600). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs Avivo.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | Avivo |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | Avivo |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon X1600's 255W — a 113.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Radeon X1600). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-73% | 255W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 168mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+76700% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Radeon X1600 launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 15.1% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.2 (Radeon X1600) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 31700% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-15% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+31700% | 0.2 |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 21 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #252 | #34 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon X1600
