
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

RADEON X700 PRO
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RADEON X700 PRO Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RADEON X700 PRO FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RADEON X700 PRO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅4312.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 14880.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
RADEON X700 PRO
2023Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌5.9% HIGHER MSRP$179 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RADEON X700 PRO Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

RADEON X700 PRO
The RADEON X700 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 27 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1287 MHz to 2245 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 76 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the RADEON X700 PRO's 76 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 14043.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the RADEON X700 PRO uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5,120 (RADEON X700 PRO). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 45.98 TFLOPS (RADEON X700 PRO). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2245 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 80 (RADEON X700 PRO) with 72 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+14043% | 76 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 5120+122% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 45.98 TFLOPS+579% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2245 MHz+53% |
| ROPs | 32 | 160+400% |
| TMUs | 72 | 320+344% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 2.5 MB+9% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 80+344% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON X700 PRO leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON X700 PRO carries 256 MB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 64-bit on the RADEON X700 PRO. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6 MB (RADEON X700 PRO) — the RADEON X700 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+2300% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 9_0b (RADEON X700 PRO). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+33% | 9_0b |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the RADEON X700 PRO's 260W — a 115.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (RADEON X700 PRO). Power connectors: None vs Legacy. Card length: 160mm vs 170mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-73% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Legacy |
| Length | 160mm | 170mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+51100% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the RADEON X700 PRO launched at $179. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 5.6% cheaper ($10 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.4 (RADEON X700 PRO) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 15800% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-6% | $179 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+15800% | 0.4 |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 31 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | July 27 2023 |
| Ranking | #252 | #29 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














