
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 167mm, a 7mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 88), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2024Why buy it
- ✅46.4% more average FPS across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅22.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (88 vs 72).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 167mm, a 7mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅46.4% more average FPS across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅22.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (88 vs 72).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 88), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 208 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 678 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 445 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 254 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 327 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 161 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 407 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 254 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 311 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 170 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,073 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 15,073 — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU leads by 40.2%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2130 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 22 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) with 72 Tensor cores vs 88.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 15,073+40% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2816+22% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 12 TFLOPS+77% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2130 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 72 | 88+22% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 2.8 MB+22% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 22+22% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 88+22% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has 8 GB. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 224 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — a 33.3% advantage for the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 224 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 50W — a 33.3% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 650W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 50W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 167mm |
| Height | — | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6 | 301.5+96% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












