
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 88), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2024Why buy it
- ✅48.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅22.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (88 vs 72).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,923 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 14,923 — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU leads by 38.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2130 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 22 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) with 72 Tensor cores vs 88.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 14,923+39% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2816+22% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 12 TFLOPS+77% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2130 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 72 | 88+22% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 2.8 MB+22% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 22+22% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 88+22% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU carries 8 GB. RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — a 52.4% advantage for the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 128-bit on the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 256 GB/s+52% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 50W — a 33.3% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 50W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6 | 298.5+94% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













