
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 100W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 160), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅85.9% more average FPS across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅122.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (160 vs 72).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 100W vs 70W.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 100W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅85.9% more average FPS across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅122.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (160 vs 72).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 160), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 100W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 379 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 230 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 72 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 826 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 590 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 628 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 332 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 212 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 79 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,656 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 19,656 — the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU leads by 82.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5,120 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 15.82 TFLOPS (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1545 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 40 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) with 72 Tensor cores vs 160.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 19,656+83% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 5120+122% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 15.82 TFLOPS+134% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1545 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 160+122% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 5 MB+117% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 40+122% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 160+122% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has 12 GB. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — a 157.1% advantage for the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU. Bus width: 96-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 48 MB (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 432 GB/s+157% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 192-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 8th gen (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 100W — a 35.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 150W (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-30% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 150W-50% |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 160mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6 | 196.6+28% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | — |
| Codename | GA107 | AD104 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #252 | #81 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












