
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 379.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 13.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 140W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅152.6% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅288.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 72).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌1082.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.3 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 140W vs 70W.
- ❌66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 379.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 13.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 140W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅152.6% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅288.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 72).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌1082.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.3 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 140W vs 70W.
- ❌66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 281 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 117 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 895 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 556 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 699 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 416 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 270 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 239 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1230 MHz to 2055 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,498 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell's 26,498 — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell leads by 146.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 36.83 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2055 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 70 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) with 72 Tensor cores vs 280.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 26,498+147% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 8960+289% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 36.83 TFLOPS+444% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2055 MHz+40% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 72 | 280+289% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 8.8 MB+283% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 70+289% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 280+289% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell has 24 GB. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 432 GB/s (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — a 157.1% advantage for the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell. Bus width: 96-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 48 MB (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 24 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 432 GB/s+157% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 192-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell's 140W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-50% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6 | 189.3+23% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 91.5% less ($1830 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 13.3 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 378.2% better value. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2024).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-92% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+378% | 13.3 |
| Codename | GA107 | GB203 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #252 | #48 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












