
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

RTXA5000-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+118.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,331 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3134.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 256), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTXA5000-8Q
2021Why buy it
- ✅255.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (256 vs 72).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,916 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌1379.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024RTXA5000-8Q
2021Why buy it
- ✅+118.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,331 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3134.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅255.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (256 vs 72).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 256), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,916 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌1379.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than RTXA5000-8Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTXA5000-8Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 23 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 44 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and RTXA5000-8Q

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

RTXA5000-8Q
RTXA5000-8Q
The RTXA5000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,916 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the RTXA5000-8Q's 4,916 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 118.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the RTXA5000-8Q uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-8Q). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-8Q). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 64 (RTXA5000-8Q) with 72 Tensor cores vs 256.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+119% | 4,916 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 8192+256% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS+310% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1695 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 72 | 256+256% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 8 MB+248% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 64+256% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 256+256% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTXA5000-8Q supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTXA5000-8Q has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6 MB (RTXA5000-8Q) — the RTXA5000-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the RTXA5000-8Q's 230W — a 106.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (RTXA5000-8Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-70% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+618% | 21.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the RTXA5000-8Q launched at $2500. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 93.2% less ($2331 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2.0 (RTXA5000-8Q) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 3080% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-93% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+3080% | 2.0 |
| Codename | GA107 | GA102 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #252 | #53 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












