GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
T400 4GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs T400 4GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs T400 4GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs T400 4GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+182.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 165.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 23.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 70W vs 30W.
T400 4GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 70W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 160mm, a 4mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,803 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.9 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs T400 4GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
T400 4GB
The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the T400 4GB's 3,803 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 182.6%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the T400 4GB uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 384 (T400 4GB). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400 4GB). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+183% | 3,803 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+500% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+519% | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz+3% | 1425 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 72+200% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+505% | 0.38 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The T400 4GB leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the T400 4GB carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 64-bit on the T400 4GB. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1 MB (T400 4GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12_0 (T400 4GB). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 7th Gen (T400 4GB). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 4th Gen.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the T400 4GB's 30W — a 80% difference. The T400 4GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (T400 4GB). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 30W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 156mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+21% | 126.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the T400 4GB launched at $159. On MSRP, T400 4GB was 5.9% cheaper ($10 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 23.9 (T400 4GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 166.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $159-6% |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+166% | 23.9 |
| Codename | GA107 | TU117 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #252 | #518 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and T400 4GB
