
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Tesla K20Xm
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+144.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $7,530 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 11021.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Tesla K20Xm
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,403 vs 10,749).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌4455.6% HIGHER MSRP$7,699 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($7,699 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Tesla K20Xm
2012Why buy it
- ✅+144.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $7,530 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 11021.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,403 vs 10,749).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌4455.6% HIGHER MSRP$7,699 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($7,699 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Tesla K20Xm?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla K20Xm still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 18 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 50 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 50 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Tesla K20Xm

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Tesla K20Xm
Tesla K20Xm
The Tesla K20Xm is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,403 points. Launch price was $7,699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Tesla K20Xm's 4,403 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 144.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Tesla K20Xm uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,688 (Tesla K20Xm). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3.935 TFLOPS (Tesla K20Xm).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+144% | 4,403 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2688+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+72% | 3.935 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 72 | 224+211% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+945% | 0.22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla K20Xm relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of video memory. Bus width: 96-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K20Xm) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Tesla K20Xm's 235W — a 108.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Tesla K20Xm). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-70% | 235W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+721% | 18.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Tesla K20Xm launched at $7699. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 97.8% less ($7530 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.6 (Tesla K20Xm) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 10500% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-98% | $7699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+10500% | 0.6 |
| Codename | GA107 | GK110 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | November 12 2012 |
| Ranking | #252 | #473 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












