GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+217.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 87.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 33.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 70W vs 30W.
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $69 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 70W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,390 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.9 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 3,390 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 217.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 8 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+217% | 3,390 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+2300% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 64-bit on the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs QuickSync (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | QuickSync |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 80% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 30W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+36% | 113.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100. On MSRP, Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 was 40.8% cheaper ($69 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 33.9 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 87.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $100-41% |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+88% | 33.9 |
| Codename | GA107 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | February 2 2024 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #252 | #508 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
