
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

TITAN RTX
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs TITAN RTX Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs TITAN RTX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs TITAN RTX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,330 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 691% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 280W, a 210W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than TITAN RTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
TITAN RTX
2018Why buy it
- ✅142.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅700% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 72).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌1378.7% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌300% higher power demand at 280W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs TITAN RTX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

TITAN RTX
The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the TITAN RTX's 20,095 — the TITAN RTX leads by 86.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the TITAN RTX uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4,608 (TITAN RTX). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 72 (TITAN RTX) with 72 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 20,095+87% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4608+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 16.31 TFLOPS+141% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1770 MHz+20% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 72 | 288+300% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 4.5 MB+96% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 72+300% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 576+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The TITAN RTX supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN RTX carries 24 GB. TITAN RTX gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) — a 300% advantage for the TITAN RTX. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 384-bit on the TITAN RTX. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6 MB (TITAN RTX) — the TITAN RTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 24 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 672 GB/s+300% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 384-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the TITAN RTX's 280W — a 120% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 650W (TITAN RTX). Power connectors: None vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-75% | 280W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 116mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+114% | 71.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the TITAN RTX launched at $2499. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 93.2% cheaper ($2330 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8.0 (TITAN RTX) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 695% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-93% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+695% | 8.0 |
| Codename | GA107 | TU102 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | December 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #252 | #91 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














