G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3070 vs Quadro P2000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3070 vs Quadro P2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Why buy it

✅211.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 171.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 5 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌193.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 75W.
❌20.4% longer card at 242mm vs 201mm.

Quadro P2000

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $74 less on MSRP ($425 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 220W, a 145W reduction.
✅Measures 201mm instead of 242mm, a 41mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2017 hardware with 5 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($425 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 211.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 218.4% in PassMark G3D (22,172 vs 6,964), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 5 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 16nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $74 more expensive on MSRP at $499 vs $425, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 171.2% (44.4 vs 16.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3070 vs Quadro P2000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3070

The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro P2000

The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Quadro P2000's 6,964 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 218.4%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Quadro P2000 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1,024 (Quadro P2000). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3.031 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1480 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro P2000
G3D Mark Score	22,172+218%	6,964
Architecture	Ampere	Pascal
Process Node	8 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	5888+475%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	20.31 TFLOPS+570%	3.031 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1725 MHz+17%	1480 MHz
ROPs	96+140%	40
TMUs	184+188%	64
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+1426%	0.38 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+220%	1.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P2000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro P2000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2000 carries 5 GB. GeForce RTX 3070 gives you 60% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070 and 256-bit on the Quadro P2000. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro P2000
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+60%	5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+220%	1.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.0 (Quadro P2000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro P2000
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.0
Vulkan	1.4+27%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P2000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2000).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro P2000
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	NVENC 6.0
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Quadro P2000's 75W — a 98.3% difference. The Quadro P2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (Quadro P2000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 201mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro P2000
TDP	220W	75W-66%
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	201mm
Height	112mm	112mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	100.8+9%	92.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3070 came in at $499, while the Quadro P2000 launched at $425. On MSRP, Quadro P2000 was 14.8% cheaper ($74 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 16.4 (Quadro P2000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 170.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3070 (2020 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro P2000
MSRP	$499	$425-15%
Performance per Dollar	44.4+171%	16.4
Codename	GA104	GP106
Release	September 1 2020	February 6 2017
Ranking	#63	#346

Search GeForce RTX 3070 on Amazon

Search Quadro P2000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.